

NVIDIA A40 wins 7 of 8 benchmarks, averaging 21.9% faster.
NVIDIA A40's numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in Wan 2.2 5B (720p), where NVIDIA A40 leads by 48% (0.31 vs 0.21 frames/s); the closest fight is Llama 3.1 8B (6% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA A40 runs 8 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 6, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA A40 | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 160.79 | 148.87 | +8% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 106.18 | 100.2 | +6% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 57.85 | 54.29 | +7% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 26.89 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 9.2 | 6.5 | +42% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 1.95 | 0 | n/a |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0.31 | 0.21 | +48% |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA A40 is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA RTX A4500 on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA A40 | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | Difference | Cost per run |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 17.3 min | 18.4 min | NVIDIA A40 1.07x faster | $0.101 vs $0.058 |
Renting by the hour, NVIDIA RTX A4500 finishes 1 of 1 cheaper. The quicker card is not automatically the cheaper way to get the work done.
| Card | Per hour |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA A40 | $0.350 |
| NVIDIA RTX A4500 | $0.190 |
NVIDIA RTX A4500 is 1.84x cheaper per hour. Cheapest on-demand rate we see across RunPod and Vast.
| NVIDIA A40 | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 48GB | 20GB |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere (workstation variant) |
| Memory bandwidth | 696 GB/s | 640 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,740 MHz | 1,575 MHz |
| TDP | 300 W | 200 W |
| Launch MSRP | $5,000 | $1,199 |
| Release | 2020-10-05 | 2021-11-23 |
NVIDIA A40 full review · NVIDIA RTX A4500 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings