

Dead heat, NVIDIA A40 and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation split our benchmark suite evenly.
NVIDIA A40's numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in Z-Image Turbo, where NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation leads by 84% (3.225 vs 5.925 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen2.5-Coder 14B (2% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA A40 runs 10 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 8, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA A40 | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 160.79 | 170.72 | -6% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 106.18 | 103.18 | +3% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 57.85 | 56.66 | +2% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 26.89 | 25.88 | +4% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 9.2 | 12.74 | -28% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 3.225 | 5.925 | -46% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 1.95 | 1.286 | +52% |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0.31 | 0.32 | -3% |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA A40 is faster on 1 of 3; NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation on 2.
| Workflow | NVIDIA A40 | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24-frame storyboard | 10.2 min | 5.1 min | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 1.98x faster |
| Full codebase review | 17.3 min | 17.6 min | NVIDIA A40 1.02x faster |
| 10 short social clips | 33.4 min | 27.9 min | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 1.20x faster |
| NVIDIA A40 | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 48GB | 32GB |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Memory bandwidth | 696 GB/s | 576 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,740 MHz | 2,550 MHz |
| TDP | 300 W | 250 W |
| Launch MSRP | $5,000 | $4,000 |
| Release | 2020-10-05 | 2023-08-09 |
NVIDIA A40 full review · NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings