

NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell wins 7 of 11 benchmarks, averaging 32.8% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Wan 2.2 5B (720p), where NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell leads by 44% (0.18 vs 0.26 frames/s); the closest fight is Qwen3-32B (26% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell runs 137 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 8, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA A10G | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3-4B tok/s | 129.87 | 179.58 | -28% |
| Llama-3.1-8B tok/s | 86.62 | 112.36 | -23% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder-14B tok/s | 47.07 | 60.62 | -22% |
| Qwen3-32B tok/s | 22.04 | 27.8 | -21% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 6.38 | 8.56 | -25% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 3.45 | 4.425 | -22% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0.18 | 0.26 | -31% |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA A10G is faster on 0 of 3; NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell on 3.
| Workflow | NVIDIA A10G | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24-frame storyboard | 9 min | 6.4 min | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 1.40x faster |
| Full codebase review | 21.3 min | 16.5 min | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 1.29x faster |
| 10 short social clips | 50.7 min | 34.2 min | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 1.48x faster |
| NVIDIA A10G | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 24GB | 24GB |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell |
| Memory bandwidth | 600 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,710 MHz | 2,617 MHz |
| TDP | 150 W | 140 W |
| Launch MSRP | $2,800 | $1,500 |
| Release | 2021-11-01 | 2025-08-01 |
NVIDIA A10G full review · NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings