

NVIDIA RTX A6000 wins 9 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 48.5% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Stable Diffusion XL, where NVIDIA RTX A6000 leads by 57% (6.38 vs 10.02 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3-4B (42% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX A6000 runs 137 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 9, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA A10G | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3-4B tok/s | 129.87 | 184.34 | -30% |
| Llama-3.1-8B tok/s | 86.62 | 124.87 | -31% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder-14B tok/s | 47.07 | 68.51 | -31% |
| Qwen3-32B tok/s | 22.04 | 32.18 | -32% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 15.73 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 6.38 | 10.02 | -36% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 3.45 | 5.4 | -36% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 2.164 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 1.05 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA A10G is faster on 0 of 2; NVIDIA RTX A6000 on 2.
| Workflow | NVIDIA A10G | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24-frame storyboard | 9 min | 7.1 min | NVIDIA RTX A6000 1.27x faster |
| Full codebase review | 21.3 min | 14.6 min | NVIDIA RTX A6000 1.46x faster |
| NVIDIA A10G | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 24GB | 48GB |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Memory bandwidth | 600 GB/s | 768 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,710 MHz | 1,860 MHz |
| TDP | 150 W | 300 W |
| Launch MSRP | $2,800 | $4,650 |
| Release | 2021-11-01 | 2020-10-05 |
NVIDIA A10G full review · NVIDIA RTX A6000 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings