

NVIDIA RTX A4500 wins 5 of 10 benchmarks, averaging 12.8% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Wan 2.2 5B (720p), where NVIDIA RTX A4500 leads by 17% (0.18 vs 0.21 frames/s); the closest fight is Stable Diffusion XL (2% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX A4500 runs 137 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 6, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA A10G | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3-4B tok/s | 129.87 | 148.87 | -13% |
| Llama-3.1-8B tok/s | 86.62 | 100.2 | -14% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder-14B tok/s | 47.07 | 54.29 | -13% |
| Qwen3-32B tok/s | 22.04 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 6.38 | 6.5 | -2% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0.18 | 0.21 | -14% |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA A10G is faster on 0 of 1; NVIDIA RTX A4500 on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA A10G | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 21.3 min | 18.4 min | NVIDIA RTX A4500 1.16x faster |
| NVIDIA A10G | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 24GB | 20GB |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere (workstation variant) |
| Memory bandwidth | 600 GB/s | 640 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,710 MHz | 1,575 MHz |
| TDP | 150 W | 200 W |
| Launch MSRP | $2,800 | $1,199 |
| Release | 2021-11-01 | 2021-11-23 |
NVIDIA A10G full review · NVIDIA RTX A4500 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings