NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation, AI & Machine Learning Comparison
NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 wins 8 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 40.8% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
What the numbers say
The gap is widest in Z-Image Turbo, where NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 leads by 96% (9.975 vs 5.1 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen2.5-Coder 14B (2% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation runs 155 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 9, models that don't fit score zero.
Benchmark results head-to-head
| Benchmark | NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 197 | 241.33 | -18% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 162.57 | 157.89 | +3% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 89.45 | 87.51 | +2% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 45.53 | 39.87 | +14% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 24.4 | 18.4 | +33% |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 16.36 | 10.7 | +53% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 9.975 | 5.1 | +96% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 4.264 | 2.229 | +91% |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 1.993 | 1.029 | +94% |
Whole-job comparison
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 is faster on 7 of 7; NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | Difference | Cost per run |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24-frame storyboard | 3.7 min | 5.5 min | NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 1.48x faster | $0.085 vs $0.067 |
| 6-panel comic page | 6 min | 9.3 min | NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 1.55x faster | $0.139 vs $0.115 |
| Character sheet, 12 poses | 7.6 min | 12.6 min | NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 1.67x faster | $0.175 vs $0.155 |
| Full codebase review | 11.2 min | 11.4 min | NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 1.02x faster | $0.259 vs $0.141 |
| 20 long-form articles | 19.1 min | 25.4 min | NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 1.33x faster | $0.443 vs $0.313 |
| 40-product photo shoot | 23.5 min | 43 min | NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 1.83x faster | $0.543 vs $0.530 |
| 100-photo restoration batch | 50.8 min | 1 h 37 min | NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 1.92x faster | $1.177 vs $1.202 |
Renting by the hour, NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation finishes 6 of 7 cheaper. The quicker card is not automatically the cheaper way to get the work done.
Cost to rent
| Card | Per hour |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 | $1.390 |
| NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | $0.740 |
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 1.88x cheaper per hour. Cheapest on-demand rate we see across RunPod and Vast.
Specifications compared
| NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 80GB | 48GB |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Memory bandwidth | 2039 GB/s | 960 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,410 MHz | 2,505 MHz |
| TDP | 400 W | 300 W |
| Launch MSRP | $17,000 | $6,799 |
| Release | 2020-11-16 | 2022-12-03 |
FAQ
- Which is better for ai & machine learning: NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 or NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation?
- NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 performs better for ai & machine learning, winning 8 of 9 benchmarks in our suite with an average 40.8% advantage.
- What are the main hardware differences between NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 and NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation?
- NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 has 80GB VRAM and a 400W TDP, while NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation has 48GB VRAM and a 300W TDP.
- Does VRAM matter more than speed between NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 and NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation?
- For AI, yes, NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation fits 2 more of our 12 workloads than NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4. A model that exceeds VRAM doesn't run slower, it doesn't run at all, so the card that fits the model wins that workload outright.
- Where is the biggest performance difference between NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 and NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation?
- Z-Image Turbo: NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 leads by roughly 96% (9.975 vs 5.1 images/min) in our testing.
NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 full review · NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings