NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing), AI & Machine Learning Comparison
NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 wins 9 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 104.5% faster.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing)'s numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
What the numbers say
The gap is widest in Stable Diffusion XL, where NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 leads by 175% (16.36 vs 5.94 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3 4B (57% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 runs 155 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 4, models that don't fit score zero.
Benchmark results head-to-head
| Benchmark | NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 197 | 125.23 | +57% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 162.57 | 84.21 | +93% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 89.45 | 46.54 | +92% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 45.53 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 24.4 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 16.36 | 5.94 | +175% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 4.264 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 1.993 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 1.64 | 0 | n/a |
Whole-job comparison
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 11.2 min | 21.5 min | NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 1.92x faster |
Specifications compared
| NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 80GB | 24GB |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing (TU102) |
| Memory bandwidth | 2039 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,410 MHz | 1,770 MHz |
| TDP | 400 W | 260 W |
| Launch MSRP | $17,000 | $6,300 |
| Release | 2020-11-16 | 2018-08-14 |
FAQ
- Which is better for ai & machine learning: NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 or NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing)?
- NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 performs better for ai & machine learning, winning 9 of 9 benchmarks in our suite with an average 104.5% advantage.
- What are the main hardware differences between NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing)?
- NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 has 80GB VRAM and a 400W TDP, while NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) has 24GB VRAM and a 260W TDP.
- Does VRAM matter more than speed between NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing)?
- For AI, yes, NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 fits 2 more of our 12 workloads than NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing). A model that exceeds VRAM doesn't run slower, it doesn't run at all, so the card that fits the model wins that workload outright.
- Where is the biggest performance difference between NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing)?
- Stable Diffusion XL: NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 leads by roughly 175% (16.36 vs 5.94 images/min) in our testing.
NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 full review · NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings