

NVIDIA A100 40GB SXM4 wins 7 of 8 benchmarks, averaging 718.9% faster.
Both cards' numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in FLUX.1 dev, where NVIDIA A100 40GB SXM4 leads by 2394% (4.264 vs 0.171 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3-4B (52% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 runs 135 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 7, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA A100 40GB SXM4 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3-4B tok/s | 193.14 | 127.01 | +52% |
| Llama-3.1-8B tok/s | 157.26 | 84.68 | +86% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder-14B tok/s | 86.2 | 46.74 | +84% |
| Qwen3-32B tok/s | 43.8 | 21.98 | +99% |
| Llama-3.3-70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 18.576 | 6.18 | +201% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 9.975 | 0.45 | +2117% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 4.264 | 0.171 | +2394% |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA A100 40GB SXM4 is faster on 2 of 2; NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA A100 40GB SXM4 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24-frame storyboard | 3 min | 54.9 min | NVIDIA A100 40GB SXM4 18.02x faster |
| Full codebase review | 11.7 min | 21.4 min | NVIDIA A100 40GB SXM4 1.83x faster |
| NVIDIA A100 40GB SXM4 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 40GB | 48GB |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing (TU102) |
| Memory bandwidth | 1555 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,410 MHz | 1,770 MHz |
| TDP | 400 W | 260 W |
| Launch MSRP | $12,000 | $9,999 |
| Release | 2020-05-14 | 2018-08-27 |
NVIDIA A100 40GB SXM4 full review · NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings