

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 wins 6 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 14.8% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in FLUX.1 dev, where NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell leads by 106% (2.036 vs 4.2 images/min); the closest fight is Z-Image Turbo (18% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell runs 12 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 7, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 375.6 | 298.78 | +26% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 268.14 | 208.3 | +29% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 149.75 | 114.63 | +31% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 71.15 | 54.27 | +31% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 26.29 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 21.08 | 17.46 | +21% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 10.725 | 9.075 | +18% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 2.036 | 4.2 | -52% |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0.8 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is faster on 1 of 2; NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 6.7 min | 8.7 min | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.31x faster |
| 24-frame storyboard | 12.5 min | 3.4 min | NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 3.70x faster |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 32GB | 48GB |
| Architecture | Blackwell (GB202) | Blackwell |
| Memory bandwidth | 1792 GB/s | 1344 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,407 MHz | 2,377 MHz |
| TDP | 575 W | 300 W |
| Launch MSRP | $1,999 | $4,500 |
| Release | 2025-01-30 | 2025-08-01 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 full review · NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings