

NVIDIA H200 wins 7 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 78.8% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in FLUX.1 dev, where NVIDIA H200 leads by 367% (2.036 vs 9.514 images/min); the closest fight is Llama 3.1 8B (0% apart).
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | NVIDIA H200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 375.6 | 318.84 | +18% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 268.14 | 268.31 | -0% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 149.75 | 148.43 | +1% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 71.15 | 76.58 | -7% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 42.66 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 21.08 | 37.16 | -43% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 10.725 | 23.175 | -54% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 2.036 | 9.514 | -79% |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 3.76 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is faster on 1 of 2; NVIDIA H200 on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | NVIDIA H200 | Difference | Cost per run |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 6.7 min | 6.7 min | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.01x faster | $0.036 vs $0.403 |
| 24-frame storyboard | 12.5 min | 3.9 min | NVIDIA H200 3.19x faster | $0.067 vs $0.234 |
Renting by the hour, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 finishes 2 of 2 cheaper. The quicker card is not automatically the cheaper way to get the work done.
| Card | Per hour |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | $0.321 |
| NVIDIA H200 | $3.590 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is 11.18x cheaper per hour. Cheapest on-demand rate we see across RunPod and Vast.
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | NVIDIA H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 32GB | 141GB |
| Architecture | Blackwell (GB202) | Hopper |
| Memory bandwidth | 1792 GB/s | 4800 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,407 MHz | 1,980 MHz |
| TDP | 575 W | 700 W |
| Launch MSRP | $1,999 | $31,000 |
| Release | 2025-01-30 | 2024-03-18 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 full review · NVIDIA H200 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings