

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 wins 6 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 37.6% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in FLUX.1 dev, where NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 leads by 109% (2.036 vs 4.264 images/min); the closest fight is Z-Image Turbo (8% apart).
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 375.6 | 197 | +91% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 268.14 | 162.57 | +65% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 149.75 | 89.45 | +67% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 71.15 | 45.53 | +56% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 24.4 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 21.08 | 16.36 | +29% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 10.725 | 9.975 | +8% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 2.036 | 4.264 | -52% |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 1.64 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is faster on 1 of 2; NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 | Difference | Cost per run |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 6.7 min | 11.2 min | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.67x faster | $0.036 vs $0.259 |
| 24-frame storyboard | 12.5 min | 3.7 min | NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 3.39x faster | $0.067 vs $0.085 |
Renting by the hour, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 finishes 2 of 2 cheaper. The quicker card is not automatically the cheaper way to get the work done.
| Card | Per hour |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | $0.321 |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 | $1.390 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is 4.33x cheaper per hour. Cheapest on-demand rate we see across RunPod and Vast.
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 32GB | 80GB |
| Architecture | Blackwell (GB202) | Ampere |
| Memory bandwidth | 1792 GB/s | 2039 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,407 MHz | 1,410 MHz |
| TDP | 575 W | 400 W |
| Launch MSRP | $1,999 | $17,000 |
| Release | 2025-01-30 | 2020-11-16 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 full review · NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings