

NVIDIA RTX A6000 wins 6 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 30% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Z-Image Turbo, where NVIDIA RTX A6000 leads by 200% (1.8 vs 5.4 images/min); the closest fight is Stable Diffusion XL (7% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX A6000 runs 9 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 6, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 231.69 | 184.34 | +26% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 153.23 | 124.87 | +23% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 83.44 | 68.51 | +22% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 32.18 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 15.73 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 9.38 | 10.02 | -6% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 1.8 | 5.4 | -67% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 2.164 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 1.05 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA RTX A6000 on 0.
| Workflow | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 12 min | 14.6 min | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1.22x faster |
| GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB | 48GB |
| Architecture | Blackwell | Ampere |
| Memory bandwidth | 896 GB/s | 768 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,452 MHz | 1,860 MHz |
| TDP | 300 W | 300 W |
| Launch MSRP | $749 | $4,650 |
| Release | 2025-02-20 | 2020-10-05 |
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti full review · NVIDIA RTX A6000 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings