

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) wins 3 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 2.5% faster.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing)'s numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in Stable Diffusion XL, where NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) leads by 14% (5.22 vs 5.94 images/min); the closest fight is Llama 3.1 8B (0% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) runs 6 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 4, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 134.96 | 125.23 | +8% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 84.2 | 84.21 | -0% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 45.06 | 46.54 | -3% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 5.22 | 5.94 | -12% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is faster on 0 of 1; NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) on 1.
| Workflow | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 22.2 min | 21.5 min | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) 1.03x faster |
| GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB | 24GB |
| Architecture | Blackwell | Turing (TU102) |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,572 MHz | 1,770 MHz |
| TDP | 180 W | 260 W |
| Launch MSRP | $329 | $6,300 |
| Release | 2025-04-16 | 2018-08-14 |
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti full review · NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings