

NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell wins 12 of 12 benchmarks, averaging 267.1% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Z-Image Turbo, where NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell leads by 1110% (0.75 vs 9.075 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3 4B (51% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell runs 12 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 6, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | GeForce RTX 4080 Super | NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 197.53 | 298.78 | -34% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 126.29 | 208.3 | -39% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 70.55 | 114.63 | -38% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 54.27 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 26.29 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 9.12 | 17.46 | -48% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 0.75 | 9.075 | -92% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 4.2 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 1.8 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0.8 | n/a |
| LTX-Video (distilled) frames/s | 1.42 | 4.58 | -69% |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0 | 0.56 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. GeForce RTX 4080 Super is faster on 0 of 1; NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell on 1.
| Workflow | GeForce RTX 4080 Super | NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 14.2 min | 8.7 min | NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 1.62x faster |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Super | NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB | 48GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell |
| Memory bandwidth | 736 GB/s | 1344 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,505 MHz | 2,377 MHz |
| TDP | 320 W | 300 W |
| Launch MSRP | $999 | $4,500 |
| Release | 2024-01-31 | 2025-08-01 |
GeForce RTX 4080 Super full review · NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings