

Dead heat, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 split our benchmark suite evenly.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000's numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in Qwen3 4B, where NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 18% (149.68 vs 127.01 tok/s); the closest fight is Qwen2.5-Coder 14B (9% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 runs 7 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 3, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 149.68 | 127.01 | +18% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 93.16 | 84.68 | +10% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 50.74 | 46.74 | +9% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 21.98 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 0 | 0.45 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0.171 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 19.7 min | 21.4 min | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 1.09x faster |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 12GB | 48GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing (TU102) |
| Memory bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,475 MHz | 1,770 MHz |
| TDP | 200 W | 260 W |
| Launch MSRP | $599 | $9,999 |
| Release | 2023-04-13 | 2018-08-27 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 full review · NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings