

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 wins 3 of 8 benchmarks, averaging 13.1% faster.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing)'s numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in Qwen3 4B, where NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 20% (149.68 vs 125.23 tok/s); the closest fight is Qwen2.5-Coder 14B (9% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) runs 4 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 3, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 149.68 | 125.23 | +20% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 93.16 | 84.21 | +11% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 50.74 | 46.54 | +9% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 19.7 min | 21.5 min | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 1.09x faster |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 12GB | 24GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing (TU102) |
| Memory bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,475 MHz | 1,770 MHz |
| TDP | 200 W | 260 W |
| Launch MSRP | $599 | $6,300 |
| Release | 2023-04-13 | 2018-08-14 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 full review · NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings