

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation wins 9 of 11 benchmarks, averaging 10.8% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Qwen3 4B, where NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation leads by 12% (152.84 vs 170.72 tok/s); the closest fight is Llama 3.1 8B (10% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation runs 10 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 3, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 152.84 | 170.72 | -10% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 93.62 | 103.18 | -9% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 51.23 | 56.66 | -10% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 25.88 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 0 | 5.925 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 1.286 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0.793 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| LTX-Video (distilled) frames/s | 0 | 3.23 | n/a |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0 | 0.32 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super is faster on 0 of 1; NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 19.5 min | 17.6 min | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 1.11x faster |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 12GB | 32GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Memory bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 576 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,475 MHz | 2,550 MHz |
| TDP | 220 W | 250 W |
| Launch MSRP | $599 | $4,000 |
| Release | 2024-01-17 | 2023-08-09 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super full review · NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings