

NVIDIA H200 wins 11 of 11 benchmarks, averaging 161.6% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Qwen2.5-Coder 14B, where NVIDIA H200 leads by 190% (51.23 vs 148.43 tok/s); the closest fight is Qwen3 4B (109% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA H200 runs 150 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 3, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super | NVIDIA H200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 152.84 | 318.84 | -52% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 93.62 | 268.31 | -65% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 51.23 | 148.43 | -65% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 76.58 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 42.66 | n/a |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 0 | 23.175 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 9.514 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 4.393 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 3.76 | n/a |
| LTX-Video (distilled) frames/s | 0 | 17.87 | n/a |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0 | 1.41 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super is faster on 0 of 1; NVIDIA H200 on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super | NVIDIA H200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 19.5 min | 6.7 min | NVIDIA H200 2.90x faster |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super | NVIDIA H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 12GB | 141GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Hopper |
| Memory bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 4800 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,475 MHz | 1,980 MHz |
| TDP | 220 W | 700 W |
| Launch MSRP | $599 | $31,000 |
| Release | 2024-01-17 | 2024-03-18 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super full review · NVIDIA H200 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings