NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, AI & Machine Learning Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER wins 5 of 20 benchmarks, averaging 13.1% faster.
Both cards' numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
What the numbers say
The gap is widest in Stable Diffusion XL, where NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER leads by 18% (2.2 vs 2.6 images/min); the closest fight is Llama-3.1-8B (11% apart).
Benchmark results head-to-head
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3-4B tok/s | 107.26 (power capped) | 119.73 | -10% |
| Llama-3.1-8B tok/s | 68.09 (power capped) | 75.3 | -10% |
| Qwen3 8B tok/s | 65.9 (power capped) | 73.65 | -11% |
| Gemma 4 12B tok/s | 41.86 (power capped) | 47.47 | -12% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen3 14B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Gemma 4 26B A4B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen3 30B A3B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Gemma 4 31B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Sana 1.6B images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 2.2 | 2.6 | -15% |
| PixArt-Sigma XL images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| LTX-Video (distilled) frames/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
Cost to rent
| Card | Per hour |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | $0.062 |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | $0.069 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 is 1.11x cheaper per hour. Cheapest on-demand rate we see across RunPod and Vast.
Specifications compared
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB | 8GB |
| Transistors | 10,800M | 13,600M |
| Die size | 445 mm² | 545 mm² |
| Process node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistor density | 24.3 M/mm² | 25 M/mm² |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing (TU104) |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,620 MHz | 1,770 MHz |
| TDP | 175 W | 215 W |
| Launch MSRP | $499 | $499 |
| Release | 2018-10-17 | 2019-07-09 |
FAQ
- Which is better for ai & machine learning: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER?
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER performs better for ai & machine learning, winning 5 of 20 benchmarks in our suite with an average 13.1% advantage.
- What are the main hardware differences between NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER?
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 has 8GB VRAM and a 175W TDP, while NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER has 8GB VRAM and a 215W TDP.
- Where is the biggest performance difference between NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER?
- Stable Diffusion XL: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER leads by roughly 18% (2.2 vs 2.6 images/min) in our testing.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 full review · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings